Robert Kepler Invitational
4/12/2014 - 4/13/2014

Location: Ohio State Scarlet GC, Columbus, Ohio

Type: College Men 

Team Scores
# Team Name Rounds Total
1 Georgia Tech  281-291-286 858
2 Alabama-Birmingham  284-292-300 876
3 Liberty  288-293-296 877
4 UNLV  291-290-298 879
5 Ohio State  294-291-297 882
6 Missouri  298-290-296 884
7 Kent State  287-296-303 886
8 Charlotte  290-301-301 892
8 Northwestern  297-291-304 892
10 Oregon State  295-301-302 898
11 Ball State  304-302-299 905
12 Penn State  308-293-308 909
13 Cleveland State  295-310-311 916
14 Miami (Ohio)  308-309-303 920
15 Eastern Michigan  301-303-322 926


Individual Scores
# Name Team Rounds Total
1 Frederik Hammer Ohio State 70-69-71 210
1 Ollie Schniederjans Georgia Tech 70-73-67 210
3 Seth Reeves Georgia Tech 70-72-72 214
4 Niklas Lindstrom Liberty 73-70-72 215
5 Sebastian Bendsen Kent State 71-69-76 216
5 Paul Dunne Alabama-Birmingham 71-74-71 216
5 Chase Marinell Liberty 74-71-71 216
5 AJ McInerney UNLV 72-71-73 216
5 Thomas Rowland Charlotte 72-72-72 216
10 Emilio Cuartero Missouri 75-71-71 217
10 Kurt Kitayama UNLV 71-71-75 217
10 Sam Love Alabama-Birmingham 70-72-75 217
13 Andrew Whalen Northwestern 71-69-78 218
14 Bo Andrews Georgia Tech 70-71-78 219
14 Mathieu Fenasse Liberty 68-75-76 219
14 Martin Rohwer Alabama-Birmingham 71-73-75 219
17 Taylor Pendrith Kent State 71-75-74 220
17 Euan Walker Missouri 77-71-72 220
19 Andrew Bailey Cleveland State 67-77-77 221
20 Anders Albertson Georgia Tech 71-75-76 222
20 J.D. Dornes Penn State 74-68-80 222
20 David Fink Oregon State 75-75-72 222
20 Carl Jonson UNLV 74-74-74 222
20 Richy Werenski Georgia Tech 75-76-71 222
25 Brian Jung Oregon State 71-75-77 223
25 Keegan McKinney Ball State 71-76-76 223
25 Boo Timko Ohio State 75-71-77 223
28 Clark Engle Ohio State 75-75-74 224
28 Matthew Negri Northwestern 73-73-78 224
30 Franco Castro Charlotte 71-78-76 225
30 Jack Perry Northwestern 77-74-74 225
30 Thomas Sutton Alabama-Birmingham 72-74-79 225
30 Alex Franklin Oregon State 74-76-75 225
34 Riley Davenport Charlotte 70-77-79 226
34 Logan Jones Ohio State 75-74-77 226
34 Kyle Kmiecik Kent State 72-77-77 226
34 Tyler Merkel Ball State 76-74-76 226
34 Scott Smith Northwestern 76-75-75 226
34 Jens Talbert Penn State 74-77-75 226
34 Zane Thomas UNLV 76-74-76 226
41 Michael Blair Eastern Michigan 72-73-82 227
41 Corey Conners Kent State 73-78-76 227
41 Linus Lilliedahl Missouri 75-74-78 227
41 Mark MacDonald Miami (Ohio) 76-75-76 227
41 Ian McConnell Liberty 73-77-77 227
41 Raoul Menard Charlotte 77-74-76 227
41 Wilson Sundvold Missouri 71-74-82 227
48 Scott Cahill Miami (Ohio) 78-75-75 228
48 McCormick Clouser Ball State 75-79-74 228
48 Tee-k Kelly Ohio State 74-79-75 228
48 Mitchell Moore Cleveland State 76-76-76 228
48 Jack Sparling Miami (Ohio) 76-77-75 228
53 Michael Balcar Cleveland State 74-76-79 229
53 James Blackwell Ball State 82-74-73 229
53 Addison Coll Ohio State 75-74-80 229
53 Greg Conrad Miami (Ohio) 78-76-75 229
53 Joey Kremer Eastern Michigan 75-77-77 229
53 Josh Whalen Kent State 77-77-75 229
59 Jake Troyer Kent State 75-75-80 230
59 Geoff Vartelas Penn State 83-70-77 230
61 Wilson McDonald Alabama-Birmingham 74-73-84 231
61 Taylor Montgomery UNLV 74-79-78 231
61 Kevin Murphy Oregon State 78-75-78 231
61 Ryan Zech Missouri 77-79-75 231
65 Scott Kim Oregon State 75-77-80 232
66 Michael Bernard Ohio State 77-80-77 234
66 John Callahan Northwestern 77-80-77 234
66 Brian ChurchillSmith Eastern Michigan 75-77-82 234
66 Harrison Winger Liberty 75-77-82 234
70 Shane Stewart Penn State 78-78-79 235
71 Max Rosenthal Ohio State 76-76-84 236
72 Brett White Eastern Michigan 79-76-83 238
73 Sean Busch Ohio State 84-74-81 239
73 Brendan Byrne Cleveland State 79-81-79 239
73 Brantley Kushner Miami (Ohio) 78-84-77 239
73 Tyler Ostrom Ball State 85-78-76 239
73 Bud Radis Miami (Ohio) 80-82-77 239
78 Christian Elliott Penn State 82-81-77 240
79 Patrick Luth Cleveland State 78-81-82 241
79 Kyle Rodes Eastern Michigan 83-77-81 241
81 Daniel Brantley Charlotte 85-82-77 244
Note: In compiling our archives, some information, such as earnings or relation to par, was unavailable. If information is missing, such as earnings, it does not necessarily mean that no money was earned and should not be interpreted as such.