Central District Invitational
2/17/2014 - 2/18/2014

Location: Lakewood Ranch (Fla.) G&CC

Type: College Women 

Team Scores
# Team Name Rounds Total
1 Vanderbilt  276-287-281 844
2 Central Florida  280-281-284 845
3 Michigan State  288-278-283 849
4 Louisville  290-289-282 861
5 SMU  288-287-288 863
6 Toledo  296-287-290 873
7 Minnesota  284-297-294 875
8 Notre Dame  292-295-294 881
9 Indiana  288-296-300 884
10 Chattanooga  292-302-291 885
11 Oakland  304-312-317 933
12 North Carolina-Greensboro  312-323-313 948
13 Rutgers  323-326-312 961


Individual Scores
# Name Team Rounds Total
1 Simin Feng Vanderbilt 67-69-71 207
2 Allyssa Ferrell Michigan State 71-67-69 207
3 Kristine Odaiyar Central Florida 68-71-69 208
3 Fanny Cnops Central Florida 68-66-74 208
5 Sathika Ruenreong Toledo 72-67-71 210
6 Katie Petrino Louisville 73-73-66 212
6 Kendall Martindale Vanderbilt 69-73-70 212
6 Jennifer Park SMU 72-69-71 212
6 Laura Restrepo Louisville 67-70-75 212
10 Courtney Ferguson Houston 71-69-73 213
10 Christine Meier Michigan State 72-71-70 213
10 Liz Nagel Michigan State 71-70-72 213
13 Manisa Isavas Toledo 70-72-72 214
13 Sarinee Thitiratanakorn Minnesota 69-74-71 214
13 Jenny Haglund SMU 68-73-73 214
13 Kaitlyn Price Central Florida 71-71-72 214
17 Antonia Scherer Vanderbilt 72-76-67 215
18 Jenny Hahn Vanderbilt 68-75-73 216
18 Kelly Grassel Michigan State 74-70-72 216
18 Katie Page SMU 75-71-70 216
18 Ashley Holder Central Florida 73-73-70 216
22 Raegan Bremer Houston 69-76-72 217
22 Irina Gabasa Vanderbilt 74-70-73 217
24 Carmen Laguna Minnesota 71-74-73 218
25 Anna Laorr Minnesota 73-73-73 219
25 Ana Sanjuan Indiana 71-74-74 219
25 Talia Campbell Notre Dame 70-76-73 219
25 Emily Haas Louisville 75-71-73 219
29 Jordan Britt Chattanooga 72-74-74 220
29 Agathe Sauzon Chattanooga 70-79-71 220
31 Ashley Armstrong Notre Dame 73-70-78 221
31 Marissa DeCola Indiana 71-73-77 221
31 Emily McLennan Chattanooga 74-74-73 221
31 Kassandra Komma Oakland 75-74-72 221
35 Jordan Ferreira Notre Dame 76-75-71 222
35 Morgan Ransom Vanderbilt 79-71-72 222
35 Louise Oxner Louisville 75-75-72 222
38 Robyn Doig Central Florida 76-74-73 223
38 Mary Mulcahy Central Florida 77-74-72 223
38 Alexandra Rossi SMU 75-74-74 223
38 Elena Villamil SMU 73-74-76 223
38 Lindsey McPherson Michigan State 73-76-74 223
38 Tara Lyons Louisville 76-76-71 223
38 Maria Mancini Indiana 73-78-72 223
45 Stephanie St-Jean Toledo 76-77-71 224
45 Kristina Nhim Notre Dame 73-78-73 224
47 Sophie Kitchen Minnesota 74-76-75 225
47 Trisha Witherby Michigan State 74-74-77 225
47 Berglind Bjornsdottir UNC Greensboro 72-79-74 225
50 Banchalee Theinthong Minnesota 73-76-77 226
50 Sarah Dusman Indiana 73-76-77 226
50 Isabella Loza Chattanooga 76-77-73 226
53 Sammie Buchanan UNC Greensboro 76-76-75 227
53 Elizabeth Tong Indiana 74-73-80 227
53 Kelli Oride Notre Dame 76-74-77 227
56 Emily Kurey Louisville 77-75-76 228
56 Emie Peronnin Minnesota 71-79-78 228
56 Jennifer Elsholz Toledo 78-71-79 228
59 Taylor Clark Rutgers 78-77-75 230
60 Porsche Campbell Chattanooga 79-76-78 233
60 Camille Chevalier Indiana 80-75-78 233
62 Haylee Zyber Oakland 72-78-84 234
62 Morgan Salm Toledo 76-78-80 234
64 Kate Hoops Toledo 78-82-76 236
65 DeeDee Russell Chattanooga 82-77-78 237
65 Samantha Moyal Rutgers 80-82-75 237
65 Danielle Crilley Oakland 77-79-81 237
68 Theresa Ann Jedra Indiana 81-80-80 241
68 Kamryn Klawitter Indiana 82-83-76 241
70 Sarah Dolmovich Chattanooga 82-78-83 243
71 Morgan Smith Oakland 80-81-84 245
72 Alyssa Albright Oakland 86-81-79 246
73 Marianna Stepp Oakland 80-87-80 247
74 Maddi MacClurg UNC Greensboro 82-85-82 249
74 Kristin Powers UNC Greensboro 84-83-82 249
76 Jackie Mullens Rutgers 86-82-82 250
77 Lindsey McCurdy SMU 81-83-88 252
78 Gabrielle Sacheli Rutgers 82-91-80 253
79 Madelin Gedeon Rutgers 83-85-88 256
80 Andrea Rangel Guevara UNC Greensboro 82-88-88 258
Note: In compiling our archives, some information, such as earnings or relation to par, was unavailable. If information is missing, such as earnings, it does not necessarily mean that no money was earned and should not be interpreted as such.