The Landfall Tradition

10/28/2016 - 10/30/2016

Location: CC of Landfall (Dye), Wilmington, N.C.

Type: College Women 

Team Scores
# Team Name Rounds Total
Individual Scores
# Name Team Rounds Total
1 Jennifer Kupcho Wake Forest 73-66-68 207
2 August Kim 72-68-70 210
3 India Clyburn North Carolina State 72-71-68 211
3 Cheyenne Knight Alabama 70-70-71 211
5 Katelyn Dambaugh South Carolina 78-67-67 212
5 Sierra Sims Wake Forest 71-71-70 212
7 Hannah Wood Oklahoma 69-73-71 213
8 South Carolina 73-70-71 214
8 Taylor Totland Furman 73-68-73 214
8 Ida Ayu Melati Putri Purdue 71-72-71 214
11 Lauren Stephenson Alabama 71-73-71 215
11 Ana Pelaez South Carolina 70-74-71 215
13 Ashley Holder UCF 71-72-73 216
13 Alice Hewson Clemson 73-72-71 216
13 Alice Chen Furman 75-71-70 216
16 Julienne Soo Oklahoma 72-73-72 217
16 Gabby Barker Texas Tech 79-67-71 217
18 Julia Ford Virginia 71-70-77 218
18 Naomi Ko North Carolina State 73-72-73 218
20 Sarah Burnham Michigan State 71-73-75 219
21 Natalie Srinivasan Furman 75-74-71 220
21 Kristen Gillman Alabama 72-76-72 220
21 Erica Herr Wake Forest 71-71-78 220
21 Jia Xin Yang South Carolina 76-74-70 220
25 Sophie Liu Iowa 74-71-76 221
25 Leslie Cloots North Carolina 73-70-78 221
27 Maria Balcazar UCF 74-76-72 222
27 Ana Ruiz Oklahoma 73-72-77 222
27 Carly Burkhardt Furman 73-71-78 222
27 Mami Yamamoto Texas Tech 73-75-74 222
31 Katharine Patrick Virginia 77-73-73 223
31 Anita Uwadia South Carolina 77-75-71 223
33 Haylee Harford Furman 75-77-72 224
33 Jordan Ferreira Notre Dame 75-76-73 224
33 Texas Tech 75-77-72 224
33 Iowa 73-79-72 224
37 Anna Redding Virginia 78-75-72 225
37 Jessica Ip Iowa 76-75-74 225
37 Valerie Tanguay Oklahoma 70-77-78 225
37 Antonia Eberhard Wake Forest 73-78-74 225
37 Sydney Legacy Clemson 76-75-74 225
37 Ayaka Nakayama UCF 77-74-74 225
37 Sierra Brooks Wake Forest 74-76-75 225
37 Covadonga Sanjuan Purdue 71-76-78 225
45 Lexi Harkins North Carolina 77-72-77 226
45 Sofia Garcia Texas Tech 77-72-77 226
45 Marta Martin Garcia Purdue 77-73-76 226
45 Marion Veysseyre South Carolina 77-71-78 226
45 Cara Barker Texas Tech 76-76-74 226
45 Emma Albrecht Notre Dame 75-76-75 226
45 Lyberty Anderson 77-78-71 226
52 Isabella DiLisio 76-72-79 227
52 Bryana Nguyen 72-78-77 227
52 Carolyn Markley Michigan State 78-75-74 227
52 Lauren Waller Penn State 77-75-75 227
52 Jessie Sindlinger Iowa 80-72-75 227
52 Maddie Rose Hamilton Notre Dame 77-73-77 227
52 Laura Kowohl North Carolina State 79-74-74 227
52 Shawn Rennegarbe Iowa 74-75-78 227
60 Mia Ayer Notre Dame 79-72-77 228
60 Leonie Bettel North Carolina State 74-75-79 228
60 Thao My Nguyen North Carolina-Wilmington 78-79-71 228
60 Purdue 77-76-75 228
60 Madelein Herr Penn State 75-77-76 228
60 Mathilda Cappeliez Wake Forest 72-78-78 228
66 Johanna Larsson UCF 74-74-81 229
67 Morgan Gonzales Virginia 75-79-77 231
67 Ellinoora Moisio North Carolina-Wilmington 77-77-77 231
69 Kate Granahan Penn State 78-82-72 232
69 Sloan Shanahan Clemson 78-74-80 232
71 Lauren Diaz-Yi Virginia 77-80-76 233
71 Cara Basso Penn State 79-75-79 233
71 Katie Sharp Michigan State 79-76-78 233
71 Ana Paula Valdes 76-77-80 233
75 Marisa Messana Clemson 79-73-82 234
76 Brynn Walker North Carolina 78-77-80 235
76 Kaeli Jones UCF 74-83-78 235
76 Kayla Thompson North Carolina-Wilmington 75-83-77 235
76 Jackie Rogowicz 79-82-74 235
80 Elizabeth Doykan Brown 81-79-76 236
80 Mia Landegren Alabama 81-77-78 236
80 Jessica Hoang Clemson 79-78-79 236
83 Mariana Ocano North Carolina 79-84-74 237
84 Christine Kim Brown 87-82-69 238
84 Cecily Overbey North Carolina State 77-77-84 238
84 Kelly Whaley North Carolina 80-82-76 238
84 Allison Snakard Notre Dame 75-82-81 238
88 Paz Marfa Michigan State 81-81-77 239
88 Rylee Pedigo Oklahoma 75-84-80 239
90 Cammie Gray Alabama 80-78-82 240
91 Rachel Corry Virginia 80-82-79 241
92 Catherine McEvoy Michigan State 80-81-81 242
93 Sienna Chapman Brown 76-85-82 243
94 Alaina Yeatts North Carolina-Wilmington 83-83-80 246
95 Madeleine Garay Brown 88-79-83 250
96 Megan Hauptman Brown 91-93-102 286
Note: In compiling our archives, some information, such as earnings or relation to par, was unavailable. If information is missing, such as earnings, it does not necessarily mean that no money was earned and should not be interpreted as such.
Home